79
12 0.213)
"It was unfair that I told the foreman it seemed, 20 had been put spore my
"trial. This was. 12th October 1837 the clerk's names
originally In the intervals, by
Wi
purpose
Official letter of the 28th September,
racanination
of all the document
Je
6
avowedly for the purpose of verifying disproving the charges of the Newspaper: ubi supra.
supra and the it
see the rendence of the prejudice of Mah Chow Wong - and Are p? Dixson & Mongan.
may be added of Mr Caldwell' _. Depositions of Mr directed to take place. It was
Caldwell & the Chinese
however
witnesses for the Mr. Caldwell himself that the morning
Crown's in the Queen
was confided; and, provotically speaking, d. 1 Javant; police Court, August and he alone who made it
It is true was at the same time direc
October 1838
Mr. Caldwell's Notes but not with the "documents themselves, which Mr Caldwell had examined.
to
25. His Report of Mr Caldwell was to the effect, that the books and papers
enr
of the pirates contained no evidence of his
the subject of the entries guilt; and
it was relating to Mr. Caldwell himself, altogether silent-
24. Mr. Mays' Memoranda", which were read in the Executive Council along with the 'Report' caused an immediate reference to be made to Mr. Mongan; who, however, was unable to assist Mr. Caldwell, But that was he his winduce in to explain the wide discrepancy perceived be
Mongeur
and from his & Mr. Mongaut
endence
the Queen & Tarrant our state labi suprà.
it plainly appears that Mr. Mongaus' ap consisted in merely handing the papers to Mr. Caldwell & without even conciling
or
being in all cases consulted by Caldwell, and that Mr. Mongaur himself,
only
a
ane
brand
of chit?
'cursory examination of into the rest not examining
at all. Mo the Report, containing the results examination so made, speaks for itself." it was prepared and signed by Mr. Caldr Mr. Mongan compared it, he says, with
the
he
^
back
to exist between two professed analyses of
Document He, however, thought. "M2 Mays' Memoranda were too circumstantial, " to be forgeries, and concluded that some of papers must have been taken out before they came to his office - He could not imagine who could have done it, nor did he Know where the papers were, before they
the
/
'came to his hands, But he would call it
tte
(12.2.
a contemptible and damnable trick, part of the perpetrators; for he thought their 'object get off Mah Chow Wong
The Council broke up suddenly - The paper
was
to
were
79
12 0.213)
"to unfair that I told the forencit it seemed, 20 had been put spore my
"tral. This was. 12th October 1837 the darf names
originally In the intervals, by
Wi
purpose
Official letter of the 28th September,
racanination
of all the document
Je
6
avowedly for the purpose of verifying disproving the charges of the Newspaper:
ubi supra.
supra and the it
see the rendence of the prejudice of Mah Chow Wong - and Are p? Dixson & Mongan.
may be added of Mr Caldwell' _. Depositions of Mr directed to take place. It was
Caldwell & the Chinese
however
witnepes for the Mr. Caldwell himself that the rooming
Crowns in the Queen
was confided; and, provotically speaking, d. 1 Javant; police Court, August and he alone who made it
It is true was at the same ture direc
October 1838
Mr. Caldwell's Notes but not with the "documents themselves, which Mr-baldwell had examined.
to
25. His Report of Mr Caldwell was the effect, that the books and papers
enr
of the pirates contained no evidence of his
the subject of the entries guilt; and
it was relating to Mr. Caldwell himself, altogettior silent-
24. Mr. Maps Alemoranda", which were read in the Executive Council along with the 'Report' caused an unmediate reference to be made. to Mr. Mongen; who, however, was unable to assist Mr. Caldwell, But that was he his winduce in to explain the wide discrepancy perenved be
Mongeur
and from his & Mr. Mongaut
endence
the Queen & Tarrant our state labi suprà.
it plaily appears that Mr. Mongaus ap consisted in merely handing the papers. to Mr. Couldwell & witteout even conciling
or
being in all cases consulted by Caldwell, and that Mr. Mongaur himself,
only
a
ane
brand
of chit?
' cursory examination of into the rest not examining
at all. Mo the Report, containing the results rxamination so made, speaks for itself." it wous prepared and signed by Mr. Caldr Mr. Mongen compared it, he says, with
the
he
^
back
to exist between two professed analyses of
Document He, however, thought. "M2 Mays"Memoranda were too circumstantial, " to be forgeries, and concluded that some of papers must have been taken out before. they came to lies office - He could not imagine who could have done it, nor did he Know where the papers were, before they
the
/
'came to his hands, But he would call it
tte
(12.2.
a contemptible und dainable trick, part of the perpetrators; for he thought their 'objeck get off Mah Chow- Wong
The Cancil broke up suddenly - The paper
was
to
were
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.